Being a defective

As usual, I am using a controversial title to entice people to read my article as any journalist or blogger would do, but at this important time in my life, this is an important article to write and for many people, a hard one to read. This article also reflects my intellectual honesty after I have decided my full inclusion in society as an equal is a missed opportunity for myself.

No way do I regard myself as defective in terms of who I am and what I have achieved but my role in society is indeed that of a defective person, a term I am using to mean ‘the most vulnerable’, ‘the severely disabled’, ‘the profoundly disabled’, the retarded and so on.

The bottom line which those in disability politics refuse to accept is that impairment/disability is split into two groups. The first is those with acceptable impairments and can include anyone as this group is self-defined. This group is seen with pity but still regarded as humans, and people with political power. An alcoholic, drug addict, overweight person or someone slightly stressed can wear the disability crown as they want as the disability label is used like a drug itself.

Of course, there are people with acceptable impairments who have a real social disadvantage but it is getting hard to spot them.

Then we have defectives, that society truly sees as inferior beings. We do not need tests or assessments for anyone to debate our unwantedness as our defectiveness goes to our core like a stick of rock and our disability badge is burnt into our souls 24/7.

The powerful and abusive carers movement have taken family interdependency from individuals and replaced it with the carer/cared for social construction. This means many organisations, especially the NHS, assume defectives like myself need to be ‘looked’ after by our carers as unlike those with acceptable impairments, we lack full autonomy and so personhood. Too many times my intelligence has been undermined because I look defective.

Employment is an issue where the difference in treatment politically between those with acceptable impairments and defectives is most obvious. While everyone supports the idea of supporting people with acceptable impairments, there is a growing belief in most corners that defectives like myself should once again be automatically written off at birth on a criteria produce by a panel of Guardian journalists.

And this argument that as a defective I have no value in society shows that despite the improvements designed for people with acceptable impairments, which defectives have indeed coincidently benefitted from, the attitude towards people like myself has not changed deep down since Nazi Germany. I would go further and suggest that the strong Carer’s movement and Workshy movement, which really exists, means things are getting worse for defectives.

The workshy movement, who represent those who think having a minor and often everyday impairment, like stress, gives them the right to the disability crown with all the perks they see it has, without any downsides. Communist Labour has promised to delivery this afternoon tea image of disability, and it will clearly be paid for by taking money away from defectives, where mercy killings by ‘carers’ will be ‘understood’.

If you wanted to know how these moments of realisation of society’s understanding of equality, or its failure, were made, have made wonderous by the Hollywood Industry, here is one right now.

As a defective who broke the mould the day I was born, I have snapped because of the way I have been treated by the NHS in recent months. There is little point complaining to a system that does not respect my existence. It is time to focus on what I want, which is experiences of all kinds, and stop helping those who despite pretending, always see me as defective.

To expose the bigotry I face as someone society sees as defective, it may be time to play the villain so many people portray me us already.

Please contact me if you have any suggestions to cope in a hostile and sometimes lonely world for people who defy their labels.

 

If you like my blog article, have a look at some of my products;

Achieve Support – https://www.simonstevens.com/achievesupport
Having Pride (My Life Story) – http://www.balsy.me
Stevens’ Manifesto – https://www.simonstevens.com/manifesto
Understand Assistance – http://www.understand.tips
Understand Dysability – https://www.simonstevens.com/understanddysability
Understand Inclusion -https://www.simonstevens.com/understandinclusion

or visit my website at http://www.simonstevens.com

Donations are always gratefully received via paypal at https://www.paypal.me/simonstevens74
You can also email me at simon@simonstevens.com
or follow me on Twitter at @simonstevens74

Calling family members carers is promoting hate and eugenics

As the years have gone by I have grown to detest the term carer and the implications it has on the relationship between people with impairments and their families and others. As soon as you say the term carer, the other person in the relationship, the ‘cared for’, is regarded as someone or something that lacks the capacity to consent, have any ability to make a contribution to their family or society, and generally regarded as a burden for everyone. As opposed to family members or friends, carers are seen as always knowing best and always have the best interests of their loved ones in mind, which this can not always be the case by default.

This article is not an attack on anybody who provides additional assistance and support to family and friends beyond what is expected in the realms of a normal family relationship. I believe most people who identify themselves as carers believe they do more hours caring each week than they actually do because they include the activities involved in normal family interdependency.

What I am attacking is the Carer’s Movement social reconstruction of family relationships into carer and ‘cared for’ relationships, therefore defining them as abnormal and so defective. The message that ‘carers save money’ is used to keep carers with the power and control within these relationships, allowing authorities to turn a blind eye to a wide range of abuse including mercy killings.

The construction of carers further abnormalises the existence of people with impairments and therefore increases the hostility towards them by society. If carers are inadvertently chained to the burdens of people with impairments then a way to free them from this incumbrance would be to support the systematic killing of people with impairments, which is a eugenics policy akin to what happened in 1930s Germany.

This means we can see a very sinister agenda originating from the strong and powerful Carer’s Movement. Despite using terms like dignity, compassion and respect, this is a movement that denies people with impairments their rightful place in families with proactive roles. Instead, people with impairments are portrayed as unwanted defectives who are merely the burdens of carers who have been forced to look after them.

In taking the ‘side’ of carers, society is slowly building an intolerance to the existence of people with impairments that not only promotes hate but also encourages support for eugenics. The only way to change this is to challenge the whole carer and cared for rhetoric and accept while people with impairments may require additional assistance and support, they still have roles to play in a family and deserve to have their family around them as opposed to state-controlled carers.

I know the strength of the carer’s movement currently means it is politically incorrect to challenge them, but it is important to challenge them to save the lives of people with impairments now and in the future. Society needs to support families to reclaim their interdependency from this movement and value the roles all people with impairments have in their families, communities and society at large.

The cares movement has become something sinister in modern day society and it is time its destructive agenda is halted and reversed to allow the role of families to be celebrated instead.